| Metric | Stimulus | Turbo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 72 | Turbo |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | Stimulus |
| Best Practices | 90 | 98 | Turbo |
| SEO | 93 | 90 | Stimulus |
| Security | 67 | 64 | Stimulus |
| TTFB | 293ms | 141ms | Turbo |
| Composite | 75 | 77 | Turbo |
Turbo outperforms Stimulus in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Stimulus leads in accessibility, SEO, security.
Choose Stimulus when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Turbo when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 34 audited Stimulus sites and 5 audited Turbo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback