Skip to content

styled-components vs WP Google Map Plugin

Based on 181 and 2 real audits

Metricstyled-componentsWP Google Map PluginWinner
Performance3349WP Google Map Plugin
Accessibility8887styled-components
Best Practices8596WP Google Map Plugin
SEO9296WP Google Map Plugin
Security6671WP Google Map Plugin
TTFB312ms958msstyled-components
Composite7379WP Google Map Plugin
Performance
styled-components
33
WP Google Map Plugin
49
Accessibility
styled-components
88
WP Google Map Plugin
87
Security
styled-components
66
WP Google Map Plugin
71
SEO
styled-components
92
WP Google Map Plugin
96
Composite
styled-components
73
WP Google Map Plugin
79

WP Google Map Plugin outperforms styled-components in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 73). styled-components leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose styled-components

Choose styled-components when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose WP Google Map Plugin

Choose WP Google Map Plugin when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 181 audited styled-components sites and 2 audited WP Google Map Plugin sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, styled-components or WP Google Map Plugin?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, WP Google Map Plugin sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, styled-components or WP Google Map Plugin?
WP Google Map Plugin sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, styled-components or WP Google Map Plugin?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor styled-components (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, styled-components or WP Google Map Plugin?
WP Google Map Plugin sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (96 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), styled-components or WP Google Map Plugin?
styled-components sites show lower Time to First Byte (312 ms vs 958 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose styled-components or WP Google Map Plugin for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. WP Google Map Plugin scores higher on overall composite score while styled-components may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback