Based on 1501 and 19 real audits
| Metric | Tailwind CSS | Vercel Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 58 | Vercel Analytics |
| Accessibility | 89 | 92 | Vercel Analytics |
| Best Practices | 89 | 92 | Vercel Analytics |
| SEO | 92 | 95 | Vercel Analytics |
| Security | 69 | 70 | Vercel Analytics |
| TTFB | 391ms | 333ms | Vercel Analytics |
| Composite | 76 | 76 | Tie |
Vercel Analytics outperforms Tailwind CSS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 76). Tailwind CSS leads in no categories.
Tailwind CSS doesn't clearly lead Vercel Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Vercel Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1501 audited Tailwind CSS sites and 19 audited Vercel Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback