Based on 1777 and 20 real audits
| Metric | Tailwind CSS | Vercel Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 60 | Vercel Analytics |
| Accessibility | 90 | 92 | Vercel Analytics |
| Best Practices | 90 | 93 | Vercel Analytics |
| SEO | 93 | 95 | Vercel Analytics |
| Security | 72 | 71 | Tailwind CSS |
| TTFB | 454ms | 336ms | Vercel Analytics |
| Composite | 77 | 76 | Tailwind CSS |
Vercel Analytics outperforms Tailwind CSS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 77). Tailwind CSS leads in security, composite score.
Choose Tailwind CSS when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Vercel Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1777 audited Tailwind CSS sites and 20 audited Vercel Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback