| Metric | Tanx | Tengine | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 43 | Tengine |
| Accessibility | 74 | 65 | Tanx |
| Best Practices | 65 | 73 | Tengine |
| SEO | 77 | 80 | Tengine |
| Security | 61 | 63 | Tengine |
| TTFB | 1050ms | 974ms | Tengine |
| Composite | 69 | 69 | Tie |
Tengine outperforms Tanx in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (69 vs 69). Tanx leads in accessibility.
Choose Tanx when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tengine when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 11 audited Tanx sites and 27 audited Tengine sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback