Skip to content

Turbopack vs Webpack

Based on 192 and 1224 real audits

View Turbopack details | View Webpack details
MetricTurbopackWebpackWinner
Performance5444Turbopack
Accessibility9290Turbopack
Best Practices9289Turbopack
SEO9593Turbopack
Security7570Turbopack
TTFB565ms402msWebpack
Composite8076Turbopack
Performance
Turbopack
54
Webpack
44
Accessibility
Turbopack
92
Webpack
90
Security
Turbopack
75
Webpack
70
SEO
Turbopack
95
Webpack
93
Composite
Turbopack
80
Webpack
76

Turbopack outperforms Webpack in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 76). Webpack leads in TTFB.

When to choose Turbopack

Choose Turbopack when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Webpack

Choose Webpack when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 192 audited Turbopack sites and 1224 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Turbopack or Webpack?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Turbopack sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Turbopack or Webpack?
Turbopack sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Turbopack or Webpack?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Turbopack (92 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Turbopack or Webpack?
Turbopack sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 93 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Turbopack or Webpack?
Webpack sites show lower Time to First Byte (402 ms vs 565 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Turbopack or Webpack for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Turbopack scores higher on overall composite score while Turbopack may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback