Based on 1 and 253 real audits
| Metric | Twenty Nineteen | Yoast SEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 45 | Yoast SEO |
| Accessibility | 80 | 89 | Yoast SEO |
| Best Practices | 100 | 87 | Twenty Nineteen |
| SEO | 85 | 90 | Yoast SEO |
| Security | 68 | 65 | Twenty Nineteen |
| TTFB | 401ms | 301ms | Yoast SEO |
| Composite | 77 | 74 | Twenty Nineteen |
Yoast SEO outperforms Twenty Nineteen in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 77). Twenty Nineteen leads in best practices, security, composite score.
Choose Twenty Nineteen when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yoast SEO when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Twenty Nineteen sites and 253 audited Yoast SEO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback