Based on 3 and 929 real audits
| Metric | Twenty Twenty | WordPress | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 48 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 79 | 88 | WordPress |
| Best Practices | 89 | 87 | Twenty Twenty |
| SEO | 87 | 91 | WordPress |
| Security | 66 | 68 | WordPress |
| TTFB | 882ms | 458ms | WordPress |
| Composite | 78 | 76 | Twenty Twenty |
WordPress outperforms Twenty Twenty in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 78). Twenty Twenty leads in best practices, composite score.
Choose Twenty Twenty when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose WordPress when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Twenty Twenty sites and 929 audited WordPress sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback