Based on 153 and 8 real audits
| Metric | Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) | WordPress.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 74 | WordPress.com |
| Accessibility | 88 | 90 | WordPress.com |
| Best Practices | 85 | 96 | WordPress.com |
| SEO | 90 | 93 | WordPress.com |
| Security | 66 | 64 | Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) |
| TTFB | 403ms | 102ms | WordPress.com |
| Composite | 74 | 77 | WordPress.com |
WordPress.com outperforms Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) leads in security.
Choose Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose WordPress.com when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 153 audited Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) sites and 8 audited WordPress.com sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback