Skip to content

Typekit vs Umami

Based on 1 and 2 real audits

View Typekit details | View Umami details
MetricTypekitUmamiWinner
Performance5572Umami
Accessibility9095Umami
Best Practices9696Tie
SEO8592Umami
Security6361Typekit
TTFB334ms325msUmami
Composite7375Umami
Performance
Typekit
55
Umami
72
Accessibility
Typekit
90
Umami
95
Security
Typekit
63
Umami
61
SEO
Typekit
85
Umami
92
Composite
Typekit
73
Umami
75

Umami outperforms Typekit in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Typekit leads in security.

FAQ

Which is faster, Typekit or Umami?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Umami sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (72 vs 55 on average).
Which has better security, Typekit or Umami?
Typekit sites score higher on security analysis (63 vs 61 on average).
Should I choose Typekit or Umami for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Umami scores higher on performance while Typekit may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback