Skip to content

Underscore.js vs Webpack

Based on 5 and 48 real audits

View Underscore.js details | View Webpack details
MetricUnderscore.jsWebpackWinner
Performance3541Webpack
Accessibility8790Webpack
Best Practices7789Webpack
SEO8992Webpack
Security6665Underscore.js
TTFB1225ms413msWebpack
Composite7174Webpack
Performance
Underscore.js
35
Webpack
41
Accessibility
Underscore.js
87
Webpack
90
Security
Underscore.js
66
Webpack
65
SEO
Underscore.js
89
Webpack
92
Composite
Underscore.js
71
Webpack
74

Webpack outperforms Underscore.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). Underscore.js leads in security.

FAQ

Which is faster, Underscore.js or Webpack?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Webpack sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Underscore.js or Webpack?
Underscore.js sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Should I choose Underscore.js or Webpack for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Webpack scores higher on performance while Underscore.js may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback