Skip to content

Varnish vs X-Clacks-Overhead

Based on 25 and 2 real audits

View Varnish details | View X-Clacks-Overhead details
MetricVarnishX-Clacks-OverheadWinner
Performance5841Varnish
Accessibility9193X-Clacks-Overhead
Best Practices9384Varnish
SEO9491Varnish
Security6473X-Clacks-Overhead
TTFB212ms345msVarnish
Composite7576X-Clacks-Overhead
Performance
Varnish
58
X-Clacks-Overhead
41
Accessibility
Varnish
91
X-Clacks-Overhead
93
Security
Varnish
64
X-Clacks-Overhead
73
SEO
Varnish
94
X-Clacks-Overhead
91
Composite
Varnish
75
X-Clacks-Overhead
76

Varnish outperforms X-Clacks-Overhead in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 76). X-Clacks-Overhead leads in accessibility, security, composite score.

FAQ

Which is faster, Varnish or X-Clacks-Overhead?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Varnish sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (58 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Varnish or X-Clacks-Overhead?
X-Clacks-Overhead sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 64 on average).
Should I choose Varnish or X-Clacks-Overhead for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Varnish scores higher on performance while Varnish may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback