Based on 19 and 91 real audits
| Metric | Vercel Analytics | Vercel Edge | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 58 | 52 | Vercel Analytics |
| Accessibility | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| SEO | 95 | 94 | Vercel Analytics |
| Security | 70 | 70 | Tie |
| TTFB | 333ms | 381ms | Vercel Analytics |
| Composite | 76 | 77 | Vercel Edge |
Vercel Analytics outperforms Vercel Edge in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 77). Vercel Edge leads in composite score.
Choose Vercel Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Vercel Edge doesn't clearly lead Vercel Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 19 audited Vercel Analytics sites and 91 audited Vercel Edge sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback