Based on 20 and 1224 real audits
| Metric | Vercel Analytics | Webpack | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 60 | 44 | Vercel Analytics |
| Accessibility | 92 | 90 | Vercel Analytics |
| Best Practices | 93 | 89 | Vercel Analytics |
| SEO | 95 | 93 | Vercel Analytics |
| Security | 71 | 70 | Vercel Analytics |
| TTFB | 336ms | 402ms | Vercel Analytics |
| Composite | 76 | 76 | Tie |
Vercel Analytics outperforms Webpack in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 76). Webpack leads in no categories.
Choose Vercel Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Webpack doesn't clearly lead Vercel Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 20 audited Vercel Analytics sites and 1224 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback