Based on 859 and 10 real audits
| Metric | WordPress | WordPress.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 63 | WordPress.com |
| Accessibility | 88 | 90 | WordPress.com |
| Best Practices | 87 | 96 | WordPress.com |
| SEO | 91 | 94 | WordPress.com |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 420ms | 232ms | WordPress.com |
| Composite | 75 | 78 | WordPress.com |
WordPress.com outperforms WordPress in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). WordPress leads in no categories.
WordPress doesn't clearly lead WordPress.com in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose WordPress.com when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 859 audited WordPress sites and 10 audited WordPress.com sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback