Based on 959 and 11 real audits
| Metric | WordPress | WP-PageNavi | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 43 | WordPress |
| Accessibility | 88 | 84 | WordPress |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | WordPress |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | WordPress |
| Security | 68 | 68 | Tie |
| TTFB | 501ms | 661ms | WordPress |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | WordPress |
WordPress outperforms WP-PageNavi in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). WP-PageNavi leads in no categories.
Choose WordPress when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
WP-PageNavi doesn't clearly lead WordPress in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 959 audited WordPress sites and 11 audited WP-PageNavi sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback