| Metric | WordPress | wpBakery | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 39 | WordPress |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | WordPress |
| Best Practices | 86 | 79 | WordPress |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | WordPress |
| Security | 65 | 62 | WordPress |
| TTFB | 312ms | 567ms | WordPress |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | WordPress |
WordPress outperforms wpBakery in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). wpBakery leads in no categories.
Choose WordPress when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
wpBakery doesn't clearly lead WordPress in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 712 audited WordPress sites and 13 audited wpBakery sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback