Based on 1050 and 364 real audits
| Metric | WordPress | Yoast SEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 47 | WordPress |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | WordPress |
| Security | 69 | 69 | Tie |
| TTFB | 553ms | 589ms | WordPress |
| Composite | 76 | 77 | Yoast SEO |
WordPress outperforms Yoast SEO in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 77). Yoast SEO leads in composite score.
Choose WordPress when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Yoast SEO doesn't clearly lead WordPress in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1050 audited WordPress sites and 364 audited Yoast SEO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback