| Metric | WPML | Yoast SEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 56 | 45 | WPML |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | WPML |
| Best Practices | 90 | 87 | WPML |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 415ms | 388ms | Yoast SEO |
| Composite | 75 | 75 | Tie |
WPML outperforms Yoast SEO in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 75). Yoast SEO leads in TTFB.
Choose WPML when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yoast SEO when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 25 audited WPML sites and 284 audited Yoast SEO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback