Skip to content
https://shangri-la.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
60
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.19g CO2 per view
FIX
1.19g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.19g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.2 MB, producing an estimated 1.19g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.22g, network 0.21g, end-user device 0.77g.
Got: 1.19g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 143.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 143.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 17882 smartphones.

1.19g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 34% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.2 MB

Your site
1.19g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.22g
Network
0.21g
End-user device
0.77g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 11.9 kg · Annual: 143.1 kg · ≈ 17882 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Next.js✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
66th percentile
FIX
66th percentile
Warning::
1.19g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 34% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 66th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.19g

66th percentile

Cleaner than 34% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 99% more
vs Target 138% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
78% efficient
REVIEW
78% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 78%
An estimated 947 KB (22%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 947 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.26g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
78% efficient

Total waste: 947 KB (22% of page weight)

Unused JS 947 KB

0.26g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4310 KB
Theoretical minimum 3363 KB
Potential savings 947 KB (0.26g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 21 KB (vs 4310 KB first visit). 121 of 122 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.19g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 1.19g)
First visit
4310 KB
Repeat visit
21 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.19g CO2 per returning visitor

121 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback