Skip to content

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Excellent global latency — average 48ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (27ms), slowest from Madrid (117ms). Azure Front Door edge cache (CONFIG_NOCACHE). Cache-Control header is missing.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
117ms
DNS 49ms · TLS 26ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
27ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 9ms
United States - Santa Clara
29ms
DNS 16ms · TLS 5ms
United Stated - New York
48ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 11ms
Singapore - Singapore
30ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 6ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
36ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 8ms
CDN: Azure Front Door (CONFIG_NOCACHE) · Avg TTFB: 48ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

ed.gov fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

Page body has only 110 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 4

Page weighs 8.3 MB (4.0 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)

Missing <html lang> attribute -- screen readers default to the user's system language and pronounce content with the wrong phonetics.

Accessibility › Document Language
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 4.2s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 4.2s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$383 investment → $13,481/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$383
3.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$13,481
$161,773/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+42102% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$375 → 0.0 mo payback · +43040% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$83 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~38%.

Barriers
10
3 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+38pp
added vs baseline
Score
49
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page takes 4.2s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 1.7s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 942ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$383 3.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$83 3 fixes in ~50 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$10,348 / month at risk ~$124,178 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$10,347 /mo

+38.5pp bounce · ~3,847 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$1.01 /mo

12635.4 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.3 MB per page load
    Saves $1.01/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

51
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
88
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.16 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.16 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

942 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.011

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.11 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

21.38 s

Desktop

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.12 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.78 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

22 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.035

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.73 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.93 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Azure Front Door · 39 peers
You 77
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Better than 53% of Azure Front Door sites See full Azure Front Door benchmark →
Azure CDN · 38 peers
You 77
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Better than 55% of Azure CDN sites See full Azure CDN benchmark →

Technology stack

Azure Front Door, hosted on Azure, with Azure CDN CDN

3 technologies detected 3 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Azure Front Door
CDN
Azure CDN
Hosting
Azure

All Detected Technologies (3)

Categories CDN Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-azure-ref: 20261015T034903Z-1556dbf4b58b2mcthC1MAD9pm40000000yc0000000001664

Azure is a cloud computing service for building, testing, deploying, and managing applications and services through Microsoft-managed data centers.

Categories PaaS Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-azure-ref

Azure Front Door is a scalable and secure entry point for fast delivery of your global web applications.

Categories Load balancers Website https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Azure Front Door) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ed.gov%2Flaws-and-policy%2Fhearings-and-appeals%2Fhearings-and-appeals-secretary-decisions)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/ed.gov)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/ed.gov"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ed.gov%2Flaws-and-policy%2Fhearings-and-appeals%2Fhearings-and-appeals-secretary-decisions" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ed.gov%2Flaws-and-policy%2Fhearings-and-appeals%2Fhearings-and-appeals-secretary-decisions

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+9

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · Page weighs 8.3 MB (4.0 MB transferred)
  • · Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Page body has only 110 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → B (86)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback