Security
· 13 checks — HTTP headers, CSP, TLS handshake, and cookie hygiene rolled into one auditable list.FContent Security PolicyActionNo enforcing CSP policy foundFIX
CSP is the most effective defense against XSS attacks. Add a Content-Security-Policy header to restrict resource loading.
default-src 'self'Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Content-Security-Policy is the browser-enforced firewall against XSS. With a strict CSP, a script injection that would otherwise steal session cookies is silently blocked. Without it, your only defense is hoping every input on every form is escaped correctly forever. Start in Report-Only mode, fix violations, then graduate to enforcing.
Source: OWASP / MDN
FSubresource IntegrityAction0 of 16 external resources have SRIFIX
| Tag | Domain | Integrity |
|---|---|---|
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <link> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
| <script> | ssl.pstatic.net | ✗ Missing |
DEmail SecurityActionDMARC: noneFIX
This only monitors, it doesn't block spoofed emails. Change to p=quarantine or p=reject.
DMARC p=none collects reports but doesn't actually block spoofed mail — phishing emails still reach inboxes.
Learn more ▾ ▴
DMARC's three policies are p=none (monitor only), p=quarantine (mark as spam), and p=reject (bounce). Most domains start at p=none to gather data, but stay there forever, leaving spoofers unblocked. After 30 days of clean DMARC reports, graduate to p=quarantine, then p=reject.
Source: DMARC.org / NIST
DPermissions-PolicyActionNo header setFIX
No Permissions-Policy header set.
Without this header, embedded iframes can request access to sensitive device features.
Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=(), usb=()
CSecurity HeadersAction5 of 10 headers properly configuredREVIEW
CSP is the most important header for preventing XSS attacks. See the CSP section for detailed analysis.
default-src 'self'Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Content-Security-Policy is the browser-enforced firewall against XSS. With a strict CSP, a script injection that would otherwise steal session cookies or rewrite the page is silently blocked. Without it, your only defense is hoping every input on every form is escaped correctly forever.
Source: OWASP / MDN
strict-origin-when-cross-originWeak Referrer-Policy values leak full URLs (with query params, tokens, IDs) to every third-party resource on the page.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Default referrer behavior shares the full referring URL with images, scripts, and other resources from third-party origins. If your URLs contain tokens, session IDs, or user emails (in query strings or paths), every third-party tracker gets them. Set `Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin` (or stricter).
Source: MDN Referrer-Policy / W3C
Controls which browser features (camera, microphone, geolocation) are allowed. Set it to restrict unused features.
geolocation=(), camera=(), microphone=()Permissions-Policy locks down browser APIs you don't use — without it, every page can request camera/mic/geolocation if XSS lands.
Learn more ▾ ▴
By default every page can request the camera, microphone, geolocation, payment APIs, and dozens more. Permissions-Policy turns off the ones you don't need so a future bug can't quietly start using them. It's a defense-in-depth header — one line, big surface reduction.
Source: MDN / W3C
COOP isolates your browsing context, preventing cross-origin side-channel attacks. Set to 'same-origin'.
same-originCOOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy: same-origin prevents cross-origin pages from sharing a browsing-context group with yours. This blocks cross-window references that enable Spectre-style timing attacks and tab-nabbing. Required if you want to enable SharedArrayBuffer.
Source: MDN / web.dev
COEP prevents loading cross-origin resources without explicit permission. Required for SharedArrayBuffer and high-resolution timers.
require-corpCOEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy: require-corp ensures every embedded resource (script, iframe, image) explicitly allows being loaded cross-origin. Combined with COOP, this enables the cross-origin-isolated context that unlocks SharedArrayBuffer, high-resolution timers, and other powerful APIs.
Source: MDN / web.dev
BCORS ConfigurationNo CORS headersREVIEW
No CORS headers detected.
Cross-origin requests are blocked by browser same-origin policy.
Origin reflection test
Some servers mirror the request Origin header, which can be exploited. Test manually:
curl -sI -H "Origin: https://evil.com" <url> | grep -i access-control
CKnown vulnerability matchesAction8 known vulnerability match(es) against detected techREVIEW
Known Vulnerabilities
| Library | Version | Severity | Summary | Fixed In |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underscore.js | 1.9.1 | high | vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection via the template function | 1.12.1 |
| Underscore.js | 1.9.1 | high | ### Impact In simple words, some programs that use `_.flatten` or `_.isEqual` could be made to crash. Someone who wants to do harm may be able to do this on purpose. This can only be done if the program has special properties. It only works in Underscore versions up to 1.13.7. A more detailed explanation follows. In affected versions of Underscore, the `_.flatten` and `_.isEqual` functions use recursion without a depth limit. Under very specific conditions, detailed below, an attacker could exploit this in a Denial of Service (DoS) attack by triggering a stack overflow. A proof of concept (PoC) for this type of attack with `_.isEqual`: ```js const _ = require('underscore'); // build JSON string for nested object ~4500 levels deep // (for this to be an attack, the JSON would have to come from // a request or other untrusted input) let json = ''; for (let i = 0; i < 4500; i++) json += '{"n":'; json += '"x"'; for (let i = 0; i < 4500; i++) json += '}'; // construct two distinct objects with equal shape from the above JSON const a = JSON.parse(json); const b = JSON.parse(json); _.isEqual(a, b); // RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded ``` A proof of concept (PoC) for this type of attack with `_.flatten`: ```js const _ = require('underscore'); // build nested array ~4500 levels deep // (like with _.isEqual, this nested array would have to be sourced // from an untrusted external source for it to be an attack) let nested = []; for (let i = 0; i < 4500; i++) nested = [nested]; _.flatten(nested); // RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded ``` An application that crashes because of this can be restarted, so the bug is most relevant to applications for which continued operation is important, such as server applications. Furthermore, an application is only vulnerable to this type of attack if ALL of the following conditions are met: - Untrusted input must be used to create a recursive datastructure, for example using `JSON.parse`, with no enforced depth limit. - The datastructure thus created must be passed to `_.flatten` or `_.isEqual`. - In the case of `_.flatten`, the vulnerability can only be exploited if it is possible for a remote client to prepare a datastructure that consists of arrays at all levels AND if no finite depth limit is passed as the second argument to `_.flatten`. - In the case of `_.isEqual`, the vulnerability can only be exploited if there exists a code path in which two distinct datastructures that were submitted by the same remote client are compared using `_.isEqual`. For example, if a client submits data that are stored in a database, and the same client can later submit another datastructure that is then compared to the data that were saved in the database previously, OR if a client submits a single request, but its data are parsed twice, creating two non-identical but equivalent datastructures that are then compared. - Exceptions originating from the call to `_.flatten` or `_.isEqual`, as a result of a stack overflow, are not being caught. All versions of Underscore up to and including 1.13.7 are affected by this weakness. ### Patches The problem has been patched in version 1.13.8. Upgrading to 1.13.8 or later completely prevents exploitation. **Note:** historically, there have been breaking changes in minor releases of Underscore, especially between versions 1.6 and 1.9. However, upgrading from version 1.9 or later to any later 1.x version should be feasible with little or no effort for all users. ### Workarounds A workaround that works for both functions is to enforce a depth limit on the datastructure that is created from untrusted input. A limit of 1000 levels should prevent attacks from being successful on most systems. In systems with highly constrained hardware, we recommend lower limits, for example 100 levels. Another possible workaround that only works for `_.flatten`, is to pass a second argument that limits the flattening depth to 1000 or less. ### References - https://github.com/jashkenas/underscore/issues/3011 - https://underscorejs.org/#1.13.8 - https://underscorejs.org/#flatten - https://underscorejs.org/#isEqual | 1.13.8 |
| jQuery | 1.11.3 | medium | 3rd party CORS request may execute | 1.12.0 |
| jQuery | 1.11.3 | medium | parseHTML() executes scripts in event handlers | 2.2.0 |
| jQuery | 1.11.3 | low | jQuery 1.x and 2.x are End-of-Life and no longer receiving security updates | 2.999.999 |
| jQuery | 1.11.3 | medium | jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution | 3.4.0 |
| jQuery | 1.11.3 | medium | passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. | 3.5.0 |
| jQuery | 1.11.3 | medium | Regex in its jQuery.htmlPrefilter sometimes may introduce XSS | 3.5.0 |
Bsecurity.txtPublished with 0 contact(s)REVIEW
security.txt
A+TLS & CertificatesTLS 1.3, 7 checks passedPASS
HTTP/2 provides multiplexing and header compression for better performance.
HTTP/1.1 forces the browser to make sequential requests, multiplying latency on every page.
Learn more ▾ ▴
HTTP/2 (and HTTP/3) multiplex many requests over a single connection, eliminating head-of-line blocking. HTTP/1.1 forces the browser to either queue requests or open many parallel connections — both worse. Most modern web servers support HTTP/2 with one config line.
Source: MDN Web Docs
Certificate Chain
A+JS Library VulnerabilitiesNo known vulnerabilitiesPASS
No known JavaScript library vulnerabilities detected.
A+Information LeakageNo exposuresPASS
No sensitive files exposed — all paths returned 404.
| Path | Status | Category | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| /.git/HEAD | ✓ Not found | Version Control | — |
| /.git/config | ✓ Not found | Version Control | — |
| /.svn/entries | ✓ Not found | Version Control | — |
| /.env | ✓ Not found | Configuration | — |
| /.env.local | ✓ Not found | Configuration | — |
| /.env.production | ✓ Not found | Configuration | — |
| /wp-config.php | ✓ Not found | Configuration | — |
| /.htaccess | ✓ Not found | Configuration | — |
| /phpinfo.php | ✓ Not found | Debug | — |
| /server-status | ✓ Not found | Debug | — |
| /server-info | ✓ Not found | Debug | — |
| /.well-known/security.txt | ✗ Exposed | Security Policy | Info |