Skip to content
https://universiteitleiden.nl

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
77
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Carbon Budget
34th percentile
REVIEW
34th percentile
Info::
0.44g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 66% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 34th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.44g

34th percentile

Cleaner than 66% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 26% cleaner ✓
vs Target 11% cleaner ✓
B
Transfer Efficiency
88% efficient
REVIEW
88% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 88%
An estimated 199 KB (12%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 199 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.06g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
88% efficient

Total waste: 199 KB (12% of page weight)

Unused JS 199 KB

0.06g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1601 KB
Theoretical minimum 1402 KB
Potential savings 199 KB (0.06g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.44g CO2 per view
PASS
0.44g CO2 per view
Info::
0.44g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.6 MB, producing an estimated 0.44g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.08g, network 0.08g, end-user device 0.28g.
Got: 0.44g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 53.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 53.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6645 smartphones.

0.44g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 66% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.6 MB

Your site
0.44g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.08g
Network
0.08g
End-user device
0.28g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.4 kg · Annual: 53.2 kg · ≈ 6645 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 7 KB (vs 1601 KB first visit). 39 of 41 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.44g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.44g)
First visit
1601 KB
Repeat visit
7 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.44g CO2 per returning visitor

39 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback