Skip to content
https://sherwin-williams.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
52
GRADE
F
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
4.01g CO2 per view
FIX
4.01g CO2 per view
Critical::
4.01g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 14.2 MB, producing an estimated 4.01g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.74g, network 0.69g, end-user device 2.57g.
Got: 4.01g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 481.3 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 481.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 60158 smartphones.

4.01g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 14.2 MB

Your site
4.01g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.74g
Network
0.69g
End-user device
2.57g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 40.1 kg · Annual: 481.3 kg · ≈ 60158 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
4.01g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

4.01g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 568% more
vs Target 702% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
87% efficient
REVIEW
87% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 87%
An estimated 1949 KB (13%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1949 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.54g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
87% efficient

Total waste: 1949 KB (13% of page weight)

Unused JS 1949 KB

0.54g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 14501 KB
Theoretical minimum 12551 KB
Potential savings 1949 KB (0.54g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 144 KB (vs 14501 KB first visit). 114 of 118 resources are served from browser cache, saving 3.97g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.04g CO2 (first visit: 4.01g)
First visit
14501 KB
Repeat visit
144 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 3.97g CO2 per returning visitor

114 resources served from cache · 4 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback