https://webagencyadvisor.it
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
78
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Checks
83 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionUnknownFIX
Green Hosting
ActionUnknown
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BTransfer Efficiency83% efficientREVIEW
Transfer Efficiency
83% efficient
83% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 83%
An estimated 154 KB (17%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 154 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.04g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
Total waste: 154 KB (17% of page weight)
Unused JS 154 KB
0.04g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 907 KB
Theoretical minimum 753 KB
Potential savings 154 KB (0.04g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
CWeb Font Weight VariantsAction10 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)REVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
Action10 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
10 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
Warning::
10 font weights loaded -- likely 100+ KB of unused payload
Loading 10 font weights typically transfers 200-400 KB just for fonts. Most pages legitimately use 2-3 weights (regular + bold, maybe medium). Audit which weights your stylesheet actually applies and trim the Google Fonts URL accordingly. Affected families: Inter.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
ACO2 Per Page Load0.25g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.25g CO2 per view
0.25g CO2 per view
Info::
0.25g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.9 MB, producing an estimated 0.25g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.05g, network 0.04g, end-user device 0.16g.
Got: 0.25g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 30.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 30.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 3766 smartphones.
0.25g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 85% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.9 MB
Your site
0.25g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.05g
Network
0.04g
End-user device
0.16g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 2.5 kg · Annual: 30.1 kg · ≈ 3766 smartphone charges
A+Repeat Visit Weight98% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 20 KB (vs 907 KB first visit). 45 of 46 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.25g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.25g)
First visit
907 KB
Repeat visit
20 KB
98% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.25g CO2 per returning visitor
45 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
ACarbon Budget15th percentilePASS
Carbon Budget
15th percentile
15th percentile
Info::
0.25g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 85% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 15th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.25g
15th percentile
Cleaner than 85% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 58% cleaner ✓
vs Target 50% cleaner ✓
Image Optimization46 images, 430 KB total, 265 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
46 images, 430 KB total, 265 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
46
Total Size
430 KB
Oversized
19
Wasted
265 KB
46 missing dimensions 45 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.