Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.

SCORE

GRADE

FIX

REVIEW

PASS

INFO

Checks

3 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX

Green Hosting

Action

Unknown

FIX

Unknown

Hosting provider could not be identified

Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.

Green hosting status based on known provider commitments

Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.

Green HostingUnable to Determine

Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

Carbon Budget

35th percentile

REVIEW

35th percentile

0.46g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g

Cleaner than an estimated 65% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.

Estimated 35th percentile

Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.

Top 10%

Target

Median website

0.46g

35th percentile

Cleaner than 65% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 23% cleaner ✓

vs Target 8% cleaner ✓

Web Font Weight Variants

No detectable Google Fonts weights

REVIEW

No detectable Google Fonts weights

The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.

Green Hosting

Action

Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure

REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

CO2 Per Page Load

0.46g CO2 per view

PASS

0.46g CO2 per view

0.46g CO2 per page view

This page transfers 1.6 MB, producing an estimated 0.46g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.09g, network 0.08g, end-user device 0.29g.

Got: 0.46g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)

At 10,000 monthly views: 55.1 kg CO2/year

With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 55.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6889 smartphones.

0.46g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 65% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.6 MB

Your site

0.46g

Top 10%

0.20g

Target

0.50g

Median website

0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center

0.09g

Network

0.08g

End-user device

0.29g

At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.6 kg · Annual: 55.1 kg · ≈ 6889 smartphone charges

A+

Repeat Visit Weight

99% cached

PASS

99% cached

99% reduction on repeat visits

Returning visitors download only 23 KB (vs 1660 KB first visit). 56 of 57 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.45g CO2 per repeat visit.

Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.46g)

First visit

1660 KB

Repeat visit

23 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.45g CO2 per returning visitor

56 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+

Transfer Efficiency

90% efficient

PASS

90% efficient

Transfer efficiency: 90%

Only 160 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.

Total waste: 160 KB (10% of page weight)

Unused JS 160 KB

0.04g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1660 KB

Theoretical minimum 1500 KB

Potential savings 160 KB (0.04g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization

25 images, 271 KB total, 126 KB wasted

INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

Total Size

271 KB

Oversized

Wasted

126 KB

16 missing dimensions 1 missing lazy loading

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.