Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 20:46 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
2.5m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'dtCookie' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

2 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 5

80 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 6.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 6.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$675 investment → $12,806/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$675
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$12,806
$153,670/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+22666% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.0 mo payback · +24487% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 6.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 4.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 4 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 529ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$675 6.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$7,605 / month at risk ~$91,260 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,605 /mo

+28.3pp bounce · ~2,827 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.31 /mo

3853.1 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~385 KB per page load
    Saves $0.31/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

47
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.33 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.91 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

529 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.61 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

11.11 s

Desktop

74
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.08 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.52 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.017

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.33 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.52 s

Categories

8
Avg score 74.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Apple · 1267 peers
You 73
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P2Security P3Content P3Performance P85Sustainability P73Accessibility P66Compliance P43SEO P46

Top 10% of Apple sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 77 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 44% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →
Facebook · 1407 peers
You 73
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P2Content P2Security P4Performance P87Sustainability P73Accessibility P72Compliance P44SEO P46

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 77 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 46% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →

Technology stack

Apple, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

20 technologies detected 4 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Crazy Egg Dynatrace Dynatrace RUM Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Apple Facebook Google Font API Google Search Console HSTS Microsoft Microsoft 365 Onsen UI Open Graph OpenSSL 1.1.1k RSS Red Hat TrustArc
Server
Apache 2.4.37
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.37

All Detected Technologies (20)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache/2.4.37 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) OpenSSL/1.1.1k

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=8zoFQifLRHAQudx9
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=nwpifn63vpc9b3pc2rfy5s1rc4ek1b

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=BHkPtVBpmJKuve50t_5YQ7dJb4su9MRlhFRVoxgKgZE

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms62417976
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: byu-edu.mail.protection.outlook.com

Onsen UI is an open-source HTML5 hybrid app framework offering mobile UI components for PhoneGap and Cordova development.

Categories Mobile frameworks Website https://onsen.io Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

OpenSSL is a software library for applications that secure communications over computer networks against eavesdropping or need to identify the party at the other end.

Categories Web server extensions Website https://openssl.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

Red Hat is an open-source Linux operating system.

Categories Operating systems Website https://www.redhat.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

TrustArc provides software and services to help corporations update their privacy management processes so they comply with government laws and best practices.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://trustarc.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Website https://crazyegg.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Dynatrace is a technology company that produces a software intelligence platform based on artificial intelligence to monitor and optimise application performance and development, IT infrastructure, and user experience for businesses and government agencies throughout the world.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.dynatrace.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Dynatrace RUM is an AI powered, full stack, automated real user monitoring platform built by Dynatrace.

Categories RUM Website https://www.dynatrace.com/platform/real-user-monitoring Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-FVREXEDRZ9

Observations (3)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'Apache 2.4.37'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

20 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbyu.edu)](https://beavercheck.com/results/280a6214-d911-4240-8b1e-00f7bb9fc71f)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/280a6214-d911-4240-8b1e-00f7bb9fc71f"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbyu.edu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbyu.edu

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (78)
  • · Cookie 'dtCookie' is missing the Secure flag
  • · 2 image-only link(s) without alt text
  • · 80 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (81)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback