Skip to content
https://pixnet.net

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
54
GRADE
F
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
11.96g CO2 per view
FIX
11.96g CO2 per view
Critical::
11.96g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 42.2 MB, producing an estimated 11.96g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 2.21g, network 2.07g, end-user device 7.68g.
Got: 11.96g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 1434.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 1434.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 179356 smartphones.

11.96g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 42.2 MB

Your site
11.96g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
2.21g
Network
2.07g
End-user device
7.68g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 119.6 kg · Annual: 1434.9 kg · ≈ 179356 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Amazon Web ServicesCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
11.96g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

11.96g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 1893% more
vs Target 2291% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 220 KB (vs 43234 KB first visit). 332 of 351 resources are served from browser cache, saving 11.90g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.06g CO2 (first visit: 11.96g)
First visit
43234 KB
Repeat visit
220 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 11.90g CO2 per returning visitor

332 resources served from cache · 19 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
97% efficient
PASS
97% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 97%
Only 1234 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
97% efficient

Total waste: 1234 KB (3% of page weight)

Unused JS 1234 KB

0.34g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 43234 KB
Theoretical minimum 42000 KB
Potential savings 1234 KB (0.34g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback