Skip to content
https://bmbf.de

SEO

· 7 checks — Canonical, meta, content depth, internal links, image SEO, and hreflang rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
92
GRADE
A
FIX
0
REVIEW
1
PASS
5
INFO
1

Cross-tab audit — SEO, performance, crawlability, mobile, structured data

Checks
7
5 PASS 1 REVIEW
B
Schema Markup Audit
2 schema types detected
REVIEW

Rich result eligibility

Organization Eligible

Organization knowledge panel

WebSite Not eligible

Sitelinks search box

Missing: name

Detected schema types

Organization json-ld → Organization knowledge panel
2/2 required · 2/4 recommended
Required fields (Google)
  • name — Required for the knowledge panel
  • url — Required for entity matching
Recommended fields
  • logo — Strongly recommended — appears in the knowledge panel header
  • sameAs — Add sameAs URLs for social profiles Connects the entity across the web
  • contactPoint — Add ContactPoint with telephone and contactType Enables direct contact from the knowledge panel
  • description — Used as the panel summary
Google's spec for this type
WebSite json-ld → Sitelinks search box
1/2 required · 1/1 recommended
Required fields (Google)
  • name — Add the site name Required for the sitelinks search box
  • url — Required to anchor the search box to your domain
Recommended fields
  • potentialAction — Enables the in-SERP search box
Google's spec for this type

Adding these recommended fields improves chances of getting Organization knowledge panel in search results.

Why this matters

Schema entity has required fields but could add recommended ones for richer SERP layouts (star ratings, prices, etc.).

Source: Google Search Central

Your WebSite structured data is missing required fields for Google's Sitelinks search box. Without these, the page won't qualify for rich results.

Why this matters

Schema entity missing required properties — Google's rich-result eligibility check fails; the schema is in source but never renders enhanced.

Source: Google Search Central

A+
Canonical URL
Properly configured
PASS
Properly configured
Info::
Canonical tag present
Got: https://www.bmftr.bund.de/DE/Home/home_node.html
Info::
Canonical is self-referencing
Info::
Canonical matches final URL after redirects
Info::
Canonical target returns 200
Info::
Canonical points to a different domain
Canonical URL Configured
Page URL https://bmbf.de Canonical https://www.bmftr.bund.de/DE/Home/home_node.html Match Self-referencing (correct) Target 200 ✓
A
Meta Tags
Title: 20 chars
PASS
Title: 20 chars
Info::
Page title is set
Got: Startseite - BMFTR
Warning::
Title is only 20 characters — consider expanding
Info::
Title and H1 have very different wording
Alignment helps users confirm they've reached the right page.
Title

"Startseite - BMFTR"

20 characters Too short
Title: Startseite - BMFTR
H1: Navigation und Service
Match: Very different
Robots: Indexable (no restrictions)

Alignment helps users confirm they've reached the right page.

Why this matters

Title and H1 disagree significantly — Google may treat one as the canonical topic and the other as off-topic, weakening ranking.

Learn more

Title is the SERP headline; H1 is the on-page headline. They should describe the same page. Large divergence (different topics, different keywords) signals confusion and Google may rewrite the title in SERP. Align both to the same primary topic.

Source: Google Search Central / on-page SEO

A
Content Depth
1935 words, Very Difficult
PASS
1935 words, Very Difficult
Info::
Page has 1935 words — good depth for search engines
Info::
Text-to-HTML ratio is 5%
Very low ratio suggests heavy framework overhead or boilerplate.
Info::
Reading level: Very Difficult (grade 24)
1935 words

Good depth

Reading level

Very Easy
Easy
Fairly Easy
Standard
Fairly Difficult
Difficult
Very Difficult

Grade 24

Text-to-HTML Ratio

5% text 95% HTML

19 KB / 403 KB

Very low ratio suggests heavy framework overhead or boilerplate.

Why this matters

Informational: ratio of visible text bytes to total HTML bytes. Very low ratios suggest excessive markup overhead.

A+
Image SEO
14 images, 14 descriptive filenames
PASS
14 images, 14 descriptive filenames
Info::
All images have descriptive filenames
14 descriptive
0 hash-based
0 generic
14 total
All images have descriptive filenames and proper SEO attributes.

See Accessibility tab for detailed alt text quality analysis.

Hreflang
0 hreflang tags
INFO
0 hreflang tags

No hreflang tags detected.

Hreflang tags are only needed for multilingual or multi-regional sites.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback