Skip to content
https://bitbeans.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
75
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
5
PASS
1
INFO
1
Checks
8
1 PASS 5 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting WordPress.comCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.58g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.58g CO2 per view
Info::
0.58g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.1 MB, producing an estimated 0.58g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.11g, network 0.10g, end-user device 0.37g.
Got: 0.58g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 69.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 69.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 8736 smartphones.

0.58g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 52% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.1 MB

Your site
0.58g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.11g
Network
0.10g
End-user device
0.37g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.8 kg · Annual: 69.9 kg · ≈ 8736 smartphone charges
B
Carbon Budget
48th percentile
REVIEW
48th percentile
Info::
0.58g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 52% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 48th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.58g

48th percentile

Cleaner than 52% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 3% cleaner ✓
vs Target 16% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
76% efficient
REVIEW
76% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 76%
An estimated 506 KB (24%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 506 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.14g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
76% efficient

Total waste: 506 KB (24% of page weight)

Unused JS 506 KB

0.14g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2106 KB
Theoretical minimum 1599 KB
Potential savings 506 KB (0.14g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
96% cached
PASS
96% cached
Info::
96% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 90 KB (vs 2106 KB first visit). 124 of 128 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.56g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.03g CO2 (first visit: 0.58g)
First visit
2106 KB
Repeat visit
90 KB

96% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.56g CO2 per returning visitor

124 resources served from cache · 4 resources re-downloaded

Image Optimization
90 images, 840 KB total, 567 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

90

Total Size

840 KB

Oversized

7

Wasted

567 KB

33 missing dimensions 80 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback