Skip to content
https://um.es

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
74
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.06g CO2 per view
FIX
1.06g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.06g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.8 MB, producing an estimated 1.06g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.20g, network 0.18g, end-user device 0.68g.
Got: 1.06g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 127.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 127.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 15942 smartphones.

1.06g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 37% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.8 MB

Your site
1.06g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.20g
Network
0.18g
End-user device
0.68g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 10.6 kg · Annual: 127.5 kg · ≈ 15942 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
63th percentile
FIX
63th percentile
Warning::
1.06g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 37% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 63th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.06g

63rd percentile

Cleaner than 37% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 77% more
vs Target 113% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 32 KB (vs 3842 KB first visit). 118 of 119 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.05g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 1.06g)
First visit
3842 KB
Repeat visit
32 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.05g CO2 per returning visitor

118 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
91% efficient
PASS
91% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 91%
Only 335 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
91% efficient

Total waste: 335 KB (9% of page weight)

Unused JS 335 KB

0.09g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 3842 KB
Theoretical minimum 3507 KB
Potential savings 335 KB (0.09g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback