Skip to content
DE · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: DSGVO · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €90/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-11-05 16:51 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
46.00s
Vs prev
—

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

1

Small gains, minimal effort.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

hamsterimkopf.de fails 1 mail check: Subdomain policy (sp=none) is weaker than domain policy (p=reject). This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Warning: 1

1 software version(s) disclosed in HTML: Astro v7.4.5

Each disclosed version enables direct CVE lookup -- attacker reads the version, searches the CVE database, targets the site with a tested exploit.

Security › HTML Version Disclosure
Warning: 2

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 3

Subdomain policy (sp=none) is weaker than domain policy (p=reject)

Informational: a labeled value pair from the audit.

Security › Email Security
Warning: 4

Unattributable: 259ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 5

base-uri directive is missing

Missing base-uri in CSP leaves a base-tag injection attack path open even on otherwise strict policies.

Security › Content Security Policy
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. The 1 performance issue below shapes how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 performance issue — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€120 investment → €361/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€120
1.3 h · 3 findings
Monthly returns
€361
€4.329/yr
Payback
0.3 mo
+3507% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€120 → 0.3 mo payback · +3507% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€30 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

1 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~2%.

Barriers
1
1 warn
Bounce delta
+2pp
added vs baseline
Score
97
A+
Speed
0
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
1
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€120 1.3 developer hours at €90/hr
Quick wins
€30 2 fixes in ~20 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€361 / month at risk ~€4.329 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€361 /mo

+1.6pp bounce · ~164 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,09 /mo

1269.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~127 KB per page load
    Saves €0,09/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction
How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.24 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.33 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

15 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.010

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.24 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.34 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

327 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

337 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.035

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

402 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

338 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 89.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Astro · 87 peers
You 91
·
Avg 80
+11 above average
0 50 100
Better than 96% of Astro sites See full Astro benchmark →
Google Search Console · 4610 peers
You 91
·
Avg 75
+16 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P96Security P95Performance P93Sustainability P81SEO P75Content P75Infrastructure P68Compliance P35

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Astro 7.4.5

6 technologies detected 1 stack layers Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Astro 7.4.5Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph Priority Hints

All Detected Technologies (6)

Astro is a new JavaScript-based static site builder.

Categories Static site generator, JavaScript frameworks Website https://astro.build Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://hamsterimkopf.de/_astro/page.B3sWyS9n.js
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=khV9huFFyAn_zZTe-1lm_baH6B9M7n472Mnvwl1HbXo

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Astro) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhamsterimkopf.de)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/hamsterimkopf.de)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/hamsterimkopf.de"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhamsterimkopf.de" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhamsterimkopf.de

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 1h total → projected A (94)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 0h → A (94)
  • · Subdomain policy (sp=none) is weaker than domain policy (p=reject)
  • · Unattributable: 259ms CPU time
  • · base-uri directive is missing
  • · 1 software version(s) disclosed in HTML: Astro v7.4.5

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → A (94)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback