Audit overview
Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
21 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
21 image-in-link without alt text
Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$825 investment → $3,076/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.
- Page takes 15.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 13.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 758msClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 23 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")Screen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance→ Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$157,500
- No privacy policy link detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Trackers detected but no privacy policy foundCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
Bounce-Rate Cost
$3,075 /mo
+26.5pp bounce · ~2,651 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 1.16
Bandwidth Waste
$0.52 /mo
6532.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~653 KB per page loadSaves $0.52/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
6.78 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
15.70 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
758 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
8.62 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
15.88 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.17 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.88 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
52 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
3.22 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
3.91 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
21 image(s) missing alt attribute
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 79 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Adobe Experience Manager, on Java
Stack Architecture
6sense 
Adobe Analytics 
Adobe Experience Platform Launch 
New Relic 
Schema App 
Cart Functionality Adobe Experience Manager 
Bootstrap 
DataGrail Facebook Google Search Console 
Lozad.js Microsoft 
Open Graph 
ServiceNow 
jQuery 3.7.1
jQuery UI 1.13.2
Java All Detected Technologies (19)
Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms.
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
DataGrail is an AI-powered privacy automation platform designed to help organizations manage data privacy compliance, automate risk assessments, and maintain regulatory alignment across data processing activities.
Lozad.js is a lightweight lazy-loading library that's just 535 bytes minified & gzipped.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
ServiceNow is a cloud computing platform to help companies manage digital workflows for enterprise operations.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.
6sense is a B2B predictive intelligence platform for marketing and sales.
Adobe Analytics is a web analytics, marketing and cross-channel analytics application.
Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.
New Relic is a SaaS offering that focuses on performance and availability monitoring.
Schema App is a tool that converts website content into schema markup, the language of search.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
19 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/3d072abd-2370-4594-b64c-5cfecac78100)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/3d072abd-2370-4594-b64c-5cfecac78100"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffortinet.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffortinet.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (83)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 21 image-in-link without alt text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+5Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 21 image(s) missing alt attribute
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found