Skip to content
SE · SEK (kr) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: SEK 850/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
94
TTFB stable →
182ms
FCP stable →
957ms
LCP stable →
2.9s
Scanned
2026-10-31 15:34 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
35.00s
Vs prev
no change

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

filion.se fails 1 mail check: No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Warning: 1

No SPF record found

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Email Security
Warning: 2

Unattributable: 269ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 3

https://filion.se/: 317ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 4

https://filion.se/assets/index-xYTj2A7z.js: 35 KB unused (42%)

This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.

Performance › JS Bundles
Warning: 5

https://filion.se/assets/index-xYTj2A7z.js: 350ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your LCP of 2.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 4 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 2.9s — fixing the 4 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

SEK 7,225 investment → SEK 40,042/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
SEK 7.225
8.5 h · 2 findings
Monthly returns
SEK 40.042
SEK 480.502/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6551% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
SEK 425 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~15%.

Barriers
4
4 warn
Bounce delta
+15pp
added vs baseline
Score
88
A
Speed
1
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page loads in 2.9s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 407ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

kr7,225 8.5 developer hours at kr850/hr
Quick wins
kr425 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

kr /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

SEK 33.767 / month at risk ~SEK 405.200 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

SEK 33.766 /mo

+15.3pp bounce · ~1,535 lost visitors/mo

CPC: SEK 22.00

Bandwidth Waste

SEK 1,16 /mo

1374.5 MB/mo × 0.842 SEK/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~137 KB per page load
    Saves SEK 1,16/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction
How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

94
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

957 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.91 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

101 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

957 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.18 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

290 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

610 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

333 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

610 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 88.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 3637 peers
You 91
·
Avg 78
+13 above average
0 50 100
Security P94Accessibility P92Performance P91Content P91Compliance P15Infrastructure P20Sustainability P74SEO P35

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
Lucide · 377 peers
You 91
·
Avg 84
+7 above average
0 50 100
Better than 84% of Lucide sites See full Lucide benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Umami
Framework
HSTS Lucide Open Graph Priority Hints React

All Detected Technologies (6)

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Umami is a self-hosted web analytics solution. It's goal is to provide a friendlier, privacy-focused alternative to Google Analytics and a free, open-sourced alternative to paid solutions.

Categories Analytics Website https://umami.is/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffilion.se)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/filion.se)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/filion.se"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffilion.se" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffilion.se

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected A (93)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 0h → A (93)
  • · Unattributable: 269ms CPU time
  • · https://filion.se/: 317ms CPU time
  • · https://filion.se/assets/index-xYTj2A7z.js: 350ms CPU time
  • · No SPF record found

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

Higher effort, long-term payoff

1 findings 8h → A (93)
  • · https://filion.se/assets/index-xYTj2A7z.js: 35 KB unused (42%)

Send Feedback