Skip to content
https://itu.int

Content

· 5 checks — Internal links, mixed-content guards, Open Graph previews, and structured data rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
70
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
1
INFO
0
Checks
5
1 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
Open Graph
Action
Open Graph tags need attention — social sharing previews may be incomplete.
FIX
Open Graph tags need attention — social sharing previews may be incomplete.
Warning::
Missing og:title
The og:title tag controls the title shown in social sharing previews.
Warning::
Missing og:description
The og:description tag controls the description in social sharing previews.
Info::
Missing og:url
The og:url tag specifies the canonical URL for the shared content.
Info::
Missing og:type
The og:type tag helps social platforms categorize the content.
Info::
Missing twitter:card
Without twitter:card, Twitter falls back to Open Graph tags. Adding it gives you more control.

The og:title tag controls the title shown in social sharing previews.

Why this matters

Without og:title, social shares fall back to the <title> tag — usually awkwardly truncated or branded for SEO not social.

Learn more

og:title controls what appears as the headline in social-share cards (Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Slack, iMessage). When omitted, platforms fall back to <title>, which is usually optimized for SEO (longer, brand-suffixed) and reads badly in social context. A 50-60-character og:title gives a clean preview.

Source: Open Graph Protocol

The og:description tag controls the description in social sharing previews.

Why this matters

No og:description means social cards either show no subtitle or scrape the first paragraph — usually unflattering.

Learn more

Without og:description, social platforms either render no subtitle or pull whatever text appears first on the page. The first paragraph is rarely written for share-card context. A purpose-written 150-200 character og:description gives a polished card.

Source: Open Graph Protocol

The og:url tag specifies the canonical URL for the shared content.

Why this matters

Without og:url, social platforms infer the canonical URL — often picking a tracking-param variant that pollutes share counts.

Learn more

og:url tells the social platform which URL to count this share against. Without it, platforms use the literal URL the user pasted (which may include utm_* parameters, ref codes, etc.). Setting og:url to the canonical form keeps share-count attribution clean.

Source: Open Graph Protocol

The og:type tag helps social platforms categorize the content.

Why this matters

Default og:type is 'website' but the right value (article, product, profile) unlocks richer metadata fields and higher engagement.

Learn more

og:type controls which other og: fields a platform respects. og:type=article enables og:article:published_time, author, and section — surfaced in news cards. og:type=product enables price/availability fields surfaced by Pinterest and shopping integrations. Default 'website' silently disables those.

Source: Open Graph Protocol

Without twitter:card, Twitter falls back to Open Graph tags. Adding it gives you more control.

Why this matters

Without twitter:card, Twitter renders posts as plain text — no preview image, no structured layout.

Learn more

Twitter requires `<meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">` (or summary) to render share-cards at all. Without it, links appear as raw text and engagement plummets vs cards. Twitter also falls back to og:image if twitter:image isn't set, so configure both.

Source: Twitter Developer Platform

Preview

itu.int

No title set

No description

Preview quality · Twitter/X D · 50/100
  • twitter:card — Add <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">
  • twitter:title — falling back from <title>
  • twitter:description — falling back from <meta name=description>
  • twitter:image — falling back from og:image
  • twitter:card is missing

    → Add <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">

ITU.INT

No title set

No description

Preview quality · Facebook D · 60/100
  • og:title — falling back from <title>
  • og:description — falling back from <meta name=description>
  • og:image — https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/images/logos/itu-logo-social-sharing.jpg
  • og:type — Add og:type — Recommended — tells Facebook the content category
  • og:url — Add og:url — Recommended — canonical URL for the share
  • og:site_name — ITU

No title set

itu.int

Preview quality · LinkedIn A · 90/100
  • og:title — falling back from <title>
  • og:description — falling back from <meta name=description>
  • og:image — https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/images/logos/itu-logo-social-sharing.jpg

itu.int

No title set

No description

Preview quality · Slack A · 90/100
  • og:title — falling back from <title>
  • og:description — falling back from <meta name=description>
  • og:image — https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/images/logos/itu-logo-social-sharing.jpg

Social preview quality

Averaged across Twitter/X, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Slack.

C · 72/100
FieldTwitter/XFacebookLinkedInSlack
og:title
og:description
og:image
og:type
og:url
og:site_name
twitter:card
twitter:title
twitter:description
twitter:image
D
Brand Presence
Action
Site-name consistency, favicon, social image, meta tags, schema, and contact signals
FIX

Brand Presence

Your brand name differs across channels — visitors see inconsistent identity.

D

47/100

Site name appears as

Page titleFind any service
og:site_nameITU
twitter:site
Organization.name

Inconsistent — names differ across channels

Brand assets

Favicon

15/15

covers multiple sizes + apple-touch-icon

Social share image

14/20

og:image set; twitter:image missing

Meta completeness

8/20

Organization schema

0/15

Contact info discoverable

5/10

contact page

Findings

  • Brand name differs across channels — users see inconsistent identity
  • Add twitter:image — Twitter falls back to og:image only when it's larger than 300×157
  • og:title missing
  • twitter:card missing
  • No Organization schema — Google can't render your logo in the knowledge panel
  • Only partial contact info discoverable — consider adding a dedicated contact page or mailto/tel link

How consistently your brand appears across channels — shared link previews, structured data, favicon, contact info.

C
Structured Data
Action
No structured data (JSON-LD) found.
REVIEW
No structured data (JSON-LD) found.
Info::
No structured data (JSON-LD) found
Adding structured data helps search engines understand your content and can enable rich results.

Adding structured data helps search engines understand your content and can enable rich results.

Why this matters

Without schema.org markup, your pages can't appear as rich results (stars, FAQs, recipes) in search.

Learn more

Structured data is what unlocks rich snippets — review stars, FAQ accordions, recipe cards, breadcrumbs, etc. — that take up more SERP space and dramatically improve click-through. The schema.org vocabulary is well-documented and JSON-LD is the easiest format.

Source: Google Search Central / schema.org

No structured data found

Structured data (JSON-LD) helps search engines understand your content better. Adding it can improve your search result appearance.

Common types include:

  • WebSite — your site identity and search box
  • Organization — your company information
  • Article — blog posts and news articles
  • Product — e-commerce product pages
  • BreadcrumbList — navigation paths
Learn more at schema.org
A+
Mixed Content
No mixed content detected — all resources use HTTPS.
PASS
No mixed content detected — all resources use HTTPS.
Info::
No mixed content detected — all resources use HTTPS
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback