Skip to content
https://santander.com.br

Sustainability

· 7 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
70
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
3
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
7
1 PASS 3 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
0.84g CO2 per view
FIX
0.84g CO2 per view
Info::
0.84g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.0 MB, producing an estimated 0.84g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.16g, network 0.15g, end-user device 0.54g.
Got: 0.84g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 100.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 100.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 12605 smartphones.

0.84g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 44% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.0 MB

Your site
0.84g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.16g
Network
0.15g
End-user device
0.54g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 8.4 kg · Annual: 100.8 kg · ≈ 12605 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
56th percentile
FIX
56th percentile
Warning::
0.84g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 44% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 56th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.84g

56th percentile

Cleaner than 44% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 40% more
vs Target 68% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
79% efficient
REVIEW
79% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 79%
An estimated 634 KB (21%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 634 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.18g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
79% efficient

Total waste: 634 KB (21% of page weight)

Unused JS 634 KB

0.18g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 3038 KB
Theoretical minimum 2403 KB
Potential savings 634 KB (0.18g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 28 KB (vs 3038 KB first visit). 162 of 166 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.83g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.84g)
First visit
3038 KB
Repeat visit
28 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.83g CO2 per returning visitor

162 resources served from cache · 4 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback