https://freshnews.org
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
88
GRADE
B
FIX
0
REVIEW
4
PASS
3
INFO
1
Checks
83 PASS 4 REVIEW
BGreen HostingGreen (hosting)REVIEW
Green Hosting
Green (hosting)
Green (hosting)
Info::
Fly.io uses renewable energy
Info::
Fly.io: Carbon offsets for all compute
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green Hosting✓ Green Hosted
Hosting Fly.io✓CDN Not identified✗
Fly.io: Carbon offsets for all compute
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
CTransfer EfficiencyAction68% efficientREVIEW
Transfer Efficiency
Action68% efficient
68% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 68%
An estimated 96 KB (32%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 96 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.02g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
Total waste: 96 KB (32% of page weight)
Unused JS 96 KB
0.02g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 306 KB
Theoretical minimum 209 KB
Potential savings 96 KB (0.02g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+CO2 Per Page Load0.07g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.07g CO2 per view
0.07g CO2 per view
Info::
0.07g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.3 MB, producing an estimated 0.07g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.00g, network 0.01g, end-user device 0.05g.
Got: 0.07g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 8.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 8.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 1063 smartphones.
Info::
Green hosting reduces data center emissions
0.07g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 90% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.3 MB
Your site
0.07g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.00g
Network
0.01g
End-user device
0.05g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 0.7 kg · Annual: 8.5 kg · ≈ 1063 smartphone charges
A+Repeat Visit Weight80% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
80% cached
80% cached
Info::
80% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 60 KB (vs 306 KB first visit). 16 of 17 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.06g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.07g)
First visit
306 KB
Repeat visit
60 KB
80% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.06g CO2 per returning visitor
16 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
A+Carbon Budget10th percentilePASS
Carbon Budget
10th percentile
10th percentile
Info::
0.07g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 90% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 10th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.07g
10th percentile
Cleaner than 90% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 88% cleaner ✓
vs Target 86% cleaner ✓
Image Optimization1 images, 0 KB total, 0 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
1 images, 0 KB total, 0 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
1
Total Size
0 KB
Oversized
1
1 missing dimensions
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.