Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
1 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
1 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€1,126 investment → €9,808/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 10.9s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 8.4s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 2.2sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No structured dataNo rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices→ Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundGDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€6.166 /mo
+28.0pp bounce · ~2,803 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€0,86 /mo
11578.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.2 MB per page loadSaves €0,86/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
6.01 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
10.94 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
2.23 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
7.74 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
19.18 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.69 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.53 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
161 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
3.30 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
5.40 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
1 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 90+ on Sustainability; you're at 64 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of core-js sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Bootstrap 4.6.2, on IIS/ASP.NET, hosted on Azure
Stack Architecture
Adobe Experience Platform Launch 
Azure Monitor 
Facebook Pixel 
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Higher Logic 
Linkedin Ads Linkedin Insight Tag 
Microsoft Application Insights 
Bootstrap 4.6.2Facebook 
Font Awesome Google Search Console Microsoft Microsoft 365 
Microsoft ASP.NET 4.0.30319
Open Graph 
Osano 
Tailwind CSS 
Webpack 
Windows Server 
YouTube 
core-js 3.28.0
ipify 
jQuery 3.6.3
lit-html 2.8.0 ASP.NET IIS 10.0 Azure Microsoft IIS 10.0
Snowplow Analytics All Detected Technologies (31)
Azure is a cloud computing service for building, testing, deploying, and managing applications and services through Microsoft-managed data centers.
Internet Information Services (IIS) is an extensible web server software created by Microsoft for use with the Windows NT family.
Snowplow is an open-source behavioral data management platform for businesses.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Osano is a data privacy platform that helps your website become compliant with laws such as GDPR and CCPA.
Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.
Windows Server is a brand name for a group of server operating systems.
YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
ipify is a service which provide public IP address API, IP geolocation API, VPN and Proxy detection API products.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.
Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.
Azure Monitor collects monitoring telemetry from a variety of on-premises and Azure sources. Azure Monitor helps you maximise the availability and performance of your applications and services.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Higher Logic is a digital marketing solution provider, formerly known as Informz.
Linkedin Ads is a paid marketing tool that offers access to Linkedin social networks through various sponsored posts and other methods.
LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.
Microsoft Application Insights is a feature of Azure Monitor that provides extensible application performance management (APM) and monitoring for live web apps.
Observations (4)
Server version exposed in headers
The Server header reveals 'IIS 10.0'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.
No build tool detected
A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Bootstrap version may be outdated
Detected Bootstrap 4.6.2. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
31 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/46d08f3d-815f-4f84-aa5c-4bf6698a14e2)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/46d08f3d-815f-4f84-aa5c-4bf6698a14e2"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fasm.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fasm.orgExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 13h total → projected B (83)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
- · 1 link(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+4Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source