Skip to content
Audit Complete

Results for https://cloudspects.com

Visit site
Netherlands Netherlands · Amsterdam Completed: Apr 25, 2026 13:44 UTC
Download Markdown Report
D65

Site Health

Score: 65 / 100

Based on 4 categories, 27 sections

Good foundation, but a few gaps could be exploited.

Major barriers for users with disabilities — up to 15% of your audience.

Solid infrastructure — fast server responses across the board.

Several regulatory requirements are not yet met.

How is this calculated?

The overall score is a weighted average of individual category scores. Categories with more impact on user experience and security carry more weight.

Security 25%Accessibility 15%Infrastructure 10%Compliance 8%

Weights reflect general web best practices. Individual needs may differ.

How the composite score is calculated

How you compare

HSTS · 2221 peers
You 65
·
Avg 74
-9 below average
0 50 100
Ubuntu · 62 peers
You 65
·
Avg 73
-8 below average
0 50 100

Top Priorities (5)

1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Security Headers
2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Content Security Policy
3

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Accessibility issues exclude users with disabilities — up to 15% of your potential audience.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
4

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Security Headers
5

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Security Headers
View fix priority matrix

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →
BeaverCheck badge
Embed this badge
[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudspects.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/512dbea1-f63b-4777-b8e2-45af3f7f130e)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/512dbea1-f63b-4777-b8e2-45af3f7f130e"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudspects.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudspects.com

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

What fixing these means

Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.

4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
C
Could reach Estimate based on resolving critical issues

Conversion Barriers

1 critical 1 warning

2 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~21%.

Trust (1)

No Content-Security-Policy header

+1% bounce

Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form

Fix: Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Usability (1)

No viewport meta tag

+15% bounce

Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature

Fix: Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Return on Investment

¥1,225 investment → ¥0.00/month returns + CNY 50,000,000 risk avoided

First-year ROI: -100%

Investment

¥1,225

4h · 5 findings

Monthly returns

¥0.00 /mo

~¥0.00 / year

    Regulatory risk avoided

    CNY 50,000,000

    if kept compliant

    • PIPL CNY 50,000,000

    ¥700 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

    Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

    Full methodology & sources

    Estimated Remediation Cost

    ¥1,225

    3.5 developer hours at ¥350/hr

    Based on China rates (¥350/hr)

    Quick wins
    ¥700 4 fixes in ~120 minutes

    Start here for the best return on investment

    Cost by category

    Cost by effort level

    Adjust assumptions
    ¥ /hr

    Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

    How developer rates are sourced

    What Inaction Is Costing You

    ¥4,166,667 / month at risk

    ~¥50,000,000 / year if left unfixed

    Compliance Risk

    ¥50,000,000

    PIPL
    • No privacy policy link detected
      PIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000

    Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

    Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

    Was this report useful?

    Thanks for your feedback!

    Global Performance 6/6 locations
    UN New York
    Full audit
    299ms
    DNS 29ms · TLS 70ms
    US Santa Clara
    600ms
    DNS 579ms · TLS 7ms
    ES Madrid
    687ms
    DNS 47ms · TLS 161ms
    SG Singapore
    792ms
    DNS 78ms · TLS 181ms
    NL Amsterdam
    590ms
    DNS 27ms · TLS 144ms
    BR Sao Paulo
    1383ms
    DNS 605ms · TLS 197ms
    CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 725ms · Cache: No cache headers

    We'll use a cached audit if available, or offer to scan.

    Checking for existing audit...

    Lighthouse Scores

    Industry-standard audits powered by Google Lighthouse.

    Core Web Vitals

    Key metrics that affect user experience.

    Desktop audit not available for this result.

    Send Feedback