Skip to content
https://polygon.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
64
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.00g CO2 per view
FIX
1.00g CO2 per view
Info::
1.00g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.5 MB, producing an estimated 1.00g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.18g, network 0.17g, end-user device 0.64g.
Got: 1.00g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 119.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 119.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 14984 smartphones.

1.00g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 39% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.5 MB

Your site
1.00g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.18g
Network
0.17g
End-user device
0.64g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 10.0 kg · Annual: 119.9 kg · ≈ 14984 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Snowplow Analytics✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
61th percentile
FIX
61th percentile
Warning::
1.00g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 39% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 61th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.00g

61st percentile

Cleaner than 39% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 66% more
vs Target 100% more
C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
71% efficient
REVIEW
71% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 71%
An estimated 1054 KB (29%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1054 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.29g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
71% efficient

Total waste: 1054 KB (29% of page weight)

Unused JS 1054 KB

0.29g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 3612 KB
Theoretical minimum 2557 KB
Potential savings 1054 KB (0.29g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 88 KB (vs 3612 KB first visit). 131 of 135 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.97g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 1.00g)
First visit
3612 KB
Repeat visit
88 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.97g CO2 per returning visitor

131 resources served from cache · 4 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback