Skip to content
Audit Complete

Results for https://linuxfr.org

Visit site
United Stated United Stated · New York Completed: Apr 22, 2026 15:21 UTC
Download Markdown Report

Your site declined by 13 points (C → D)

Compared to scan from 5 days ago

View previous audit
D64

Site Health

Score: 64 / 100 13

Based on 4 categories, 27 sections

Good foundation, but a few gaps could be exploited.

Major barriers for users with disabilities — up to 15% of your audience.

Solid infrastructure — fast server responses across the board.

Several regulatory requirements are not yet met.

How is this calculated?

The overall score is a weighted average of individual category scores. Categories with more impact on user experience and security carry more weight.

Security 25%Accessibility 15%Infrastructure 10%Compliance 8%

Weights reflect general web best practices. Individual needs may differ.

How the composite score is calculated

How you compare

HSTS · 2221 peers
You 64
·
Avg 74
-10 below average
0 50 100
Nginx · 871 peers
You 64
·
Avg 73
-9 below average
0 50 100

Top Priorities (5)

1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Security Headers
2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Content Security Policy
3

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Security Headers
4

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Security Headers
5

DMARC policy is none — monitoring only

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Email Security
View fix priority matrix

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

5

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →
BeaverCheck badge
Embed this badge
[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxfr.org)](https://beavercheck.com/results/525704ab-ae24-4062-b1a2-c3859fd37908)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/525704ab-ae24-4062-b1a2-c3859fd37908"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxfr.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxfr.org

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

What fixing these means

Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.

5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Conversion Barriers

1 critical 1 warning

2 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~21%.

Trust (1)

No Content-Security-Policy header

+1% bounce

Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form

Fix: Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Usability (1)

No viewport meta tag

+15% bounce

Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature

Fix: Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Return on Investment

€200 investment → €0.00/month returns + EUR 20,000,000 risk avoided

First-year ROI: -100%

Investment

€200

2h · 5 findings

Monthly returns

€0.00 /mo

~€0.00 / year

    Regulatory risk avoided

    EUR 20,000,000

    if kept compliant

    • RGPD EUR 20,000,000

    Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

    Full methodology & sources

    Estimated Remediation Cost

    €200

    2.5 developer hours at €80/hr

    Based on France rates (€80/hr)

    Quick wins
    €200 5 fixes in ~150 minutes

    Start here for the best return on investment

    Cost by category

    Cost by effort level

    Adjust assumptions
    /hr

    Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

    How developer rates are sourced

    What Inaction Is Costing You

    €1,666,667 / month at risk

    ~€20,000,000 / year if left unfixed

    Compliance Risk

    €20,000,000

    RGPD
    • No privacy policy link detected
      RGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000

    Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

    Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

    Was this report useful?

    Thanks for your feedback!

    Global Performance 6/6 locations
    UN New York
    Full audit
    532ms
    DNS 12ms · TLS 168ms
    ES Madrid
    357ms
    DNS 35ms · TLS 102ms
    NL Amsterdam
    236ms
    DNS 9ms · TLS 35ms
    US Santa Clara
    1014ms
    DNS 145ms · TLS 287ms
    SG Singapore
    1134ms
    DNS 163ms · TLS 321ms
    BR Sao Paulo
    1301ms
    DNS 132ms · TLS 450ms
    CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 762ms · Cache: max-age=0, private, must-revalidate
    Recent Trends
    Performance degrading ↓
    79
    TTFB improving ↑
    532ms
    FCP stable →
    1.7s
    LCP degrading ↓
    5.4s

    We'll use a cached audit if available, or offer to scan.

    Checking for existing audit...

    Lighthouse Scores

    Industry-standard audits powered by Google Lighthouse.

    Core Web Vitals

    Key metrics that affect user experience.

    Desktop audit not available for this result.

    Send Feedback