Skip to content
https://pccc.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
78
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
3
INFO
0
Checks
6
3 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Apache HTTP ServerCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Transfer Efficiency
85% efficient
REVIEW
85% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 85%
An estimated 217 KB (15%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 217 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.06g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
85% efficient

Total waste: 217 KB (15% of page weight)

Unused JS 217 KB

0.06g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1466 KB
Theoretical minimum 1249 KB
Potential savings 217 KB (0.06g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.41g CO2 per view
PASS
0.41g CO2 per view
Info::
0.41g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.4 MB, producing an estimated 0.41g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.08g, network 0.07g, end-user device 0.26g.
Got: 0.41g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 48.7 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 48.7 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6083 smartphones.

0.41g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 70% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.4 MB

Your site
0.41g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.08g
Network
0.07g
End-user device
0.26g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.1 kg · Annual: 48.7 kg · ≈ 6083 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 19 KB (vs 1466 KB first visit). 118 of 119 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.40g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.41g)
First visit
1466 KB
Repeat visit
19 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.40g CO2 per returning visitor

118 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
30th percentile
PASS
30th percentile
Info::
0.41g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 70% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 30th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.41g

30th percentile

Cleaner than 70% of websites

Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 32% cleaner ✓
vs Target 19% cleaner ✓
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback