Skip to content
https://fiat.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
61
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
6.27g CO2 per view
FIX
6.27g CO2 per view
Critical::
6.27g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 22.1 MB, producing an estimated 6.27g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 1.16g, network 1.08g, end-user device 4.02g.
Got: 6.27g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 752.0 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 752.0 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 94004 smartphones.

6.27g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 22.1 MB

Your site
6.27g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
1.16g
Network
1.08g
End-user device
4.02g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 62.7 kg · Annual: 752.0 kg · ≈ 94004 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
6.27g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

6.27g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 944% more
vs Target 1153% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 515 KB (vs 22660 KB first visit). 131 of 139 resources are served from browser cache, saving 6.12g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.14g CO2 (first visit: 6.27g)
First visit
22660 KB
Repeat visit
515 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 6.12g CO2 per returning visitor

131 resources served from cache · 8 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
99% efficient
PASS
99% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 99%
Only 292 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
99% efficient

Total waste: 292 KB (1% of page weight)

Unused JS 292 KB

0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 22660 KB
Theoretical minimum 22367 KB
Potential savings 292 KB (0.08g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
32 images, 896 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

32

Total Size

896 KB

29 missing alt text 3 missing dimensions 25 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback