Skip to content
https://td.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
71
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
2
INFO
0
Checks
6
2 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Akamai: Committed to 50% renewable by 2030
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Akamai

Akamai: Committed to 50% renewable by 2030

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Carbon Budget
33th percentile
REVIEW
33th percentile
Info::
0.44g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 67% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 33th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.44g

33rd percentile

Cleaner than 67% of websites

Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 27% cleaner ✓
vs Target 13% cleaner ✓
C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
69% efficient
REVIEW
69% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 69%
An estimated 490 KB (31%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 490 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.14g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
69% efficient

Total waste: 490 KB (31% of page weight)

Unused JS 490 KB

0.14g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1573 KB
Theoretical minimum 1083 KB
Potential savings 490 KB (0.14g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.44g CO2 per view
PASS
0.44g CO2 per view
Info::
0.44g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.5 MB, producing an estimated 0.44g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.08g, network 0.08g, end-user device 0.28g.
Got: 0.44g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 52.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 52.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6528 smartphones.

0.44g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 67% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.5 MB

Your site
0.44g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.08g
Network
0.08g
End-user device
0.28g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.4 kg · Annual: 52.2 kg · ≈ 6528 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 41 KB (vs 1573 KB first visit). 48 of 49 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.42g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.44g)
First visit
1573 KB
Repeat visit
41 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.42g CO2 per returning visitor

48 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback