Skip to content
https://bild.de

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
68
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.86g CO2 per view
FIX
1.86g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.86g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 6.6 MB, producing an estimated 1.86g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.34g, network 0.32g, end-user device 1.20g.
Got: 1.86g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 223.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 223.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 27939 smartphones.

1.86g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 14% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 6.6 MB

Your site
1.86g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.34g
Network
0.32g
End-user device
1.20g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 18.6 kg · Annual: 223.5 kg · ≈ 27939 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Akamai: Committed to 50% renewable by 2030
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Akamai✗

Akamai: Committed to 50% renewable by 2030

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
86th percentile
FIX
86th percentile
Warning::
1.86g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 14% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 86th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.86g

86th percentile

Cleaner than 14% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 210% more
vs Target 273% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 117 KB (vs 6734 KB first visit). 240 of 243 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.83g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.03g CO2 (first visit: 1.86g)
First visit
6734 KB
Repeat visit
117 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.83g CO2 per returning visitor

240 resources served from cache · 3 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
98% efficient
PASS
98% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 98%
Only 118 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
98% efficient

Total waste: 118 KB (2% of page weight)

Unused JS 118 KB

0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 6734 KB
Theoretical minimum 6616 KB
Potential savings 118 KB (0.03g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback