Skip to content
https://defensenews.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
72
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
4
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 4 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Amazon Web Services✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.52g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.52g CO2 per view
Info::
0.52g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.9 MB, producing an estimated 0.52g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.10g, network 0.09g, end-user device 0.34g.
Got: 0.52g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 62.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 62.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 7866 smartphones.

0.52g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 58% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.9 MB

Your site
0.52g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.10g
Network
0.09g
End-user device
0.34g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.2 kg · Annual: 62.9 kg · ≈ 7866 smartphone charges
B
Carbon Budget
42th percentile
REVIEW
42th percentile
Info::
0.52g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 58% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 42th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.52g

42nd percentile

Cleaner than 58% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 13% cleaner ✓
vs Target 5% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
77% efficient
REVIEW
77% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 77%
An estimated 442 KB (23%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 442 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.12g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
77% efficient

Total waste: 442 KB (23% of page weight)

Unused JS 442 KB

0.12g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1896 KB
Theoretical minimum 1453 KB
Potential savings 442 KB (0.12g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
96% cached
PASS
96% cached
Info::
96% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 78 KB (vs 1896 KB first visit). 76 of 79 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.50g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 0.52g)
First visit
1896 KB
Repeat visit
78 KB

96% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.50g CO2 per returning visitor

76 resources served from cache · 3 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback