Performance
· 15 checks — Lighthouse + waterfall + sustainability rolled into one auditable list.Performance-focused optimization plan with CWV assessment, top offenders, and time estimates
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.23 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.31 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
2 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.020
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.69 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.20 s
Page Load Progression
DThird-Party ImpactAction100% third-party, 0 ms blockingFIX
DJS BundlesAction20 scripts, 305 KB unusedFIX
Downloaded but never executed on this page.
| Script | Size | Unused | Minified | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://cmpv2.infoworld.com/Notice.8f529.js | 91 KB | 61 KB (67%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-YF8BFFCBPC&cx=c>m=4e64h1 | 147 KB | 60 KB (41%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NN43QC7W | 209 KB | 58 KB (28%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.infoworld.com/_static/??-eJydj90KwjAMRl/IrOrY5o34LP0JW0bb1SZl7O0t6kCvBCHwQfg4OVFrArtEwSjKeqoBoUDyZaTIitwIMlF2kHSWTTliUWwzJWE1r8nrDXMz80H9j0kZDTnQjncQReuLw3qhzr1g3t7RBIo/SxBozFrws7yryYQBXz7mbMBoRnjuvpVsYVlC/cALMXq0UkG3cD0NQ9923eXYzw9Ah3RJ | 63 KB | 37 KB (59%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.infoworld.com/_static/??-eJyl0N0KwjAMBeAXMtYf5rwRnyVt6tbZtaXJnL69dRdDQRH0KhA4Xw5RYwITg9ggynhXBvQDJD80LrBy1IC0LhMkzHJT5FgUm+ySsDrlKUegMwZKkQW0j+a87HihnlhpbW+LNYLeaDCt8wTT7pXDDq8+IkGDYsvB4vEnqtR6WBrZvqP0EMjbH8Nzj38azIi9lNRH5dtLUirJY39Y1/VuW1X7Vd3dAaFTn/M= | 42 KB | 23 KB (56%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://macro.adnami.io/macro/gen/adsm.macro.rmb.js | 25 KB | 22 KB (88%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://cmpv2.infoworld.com/unified/4.40.1/usnat.f12613136193900e32e2.bundle.js | 42 KB | 22 KB (52%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.infoworld.com/wp-content/client-mu-plugins/idg-third-party/dist/scripts/index.js?ver=1776355806 | 38 KB | 22 KB (57%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://cmpv2.infoworld.com/unified/wrapperMessagingWithoutDetection.js | 42 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.infoworld.com/_static/??-eJylzzELwkAMBeA/5DUq2OogDg6duoi459p4ptxdShMU/71FwV27hvc+XuAxuFayUTawGyVS4C44v/bOo5J73yCyB21HHkyhlTRInvLuKmI0Fr0u4HclompRkzWYMcxTToRdIyP9aXz/yXjngMaS56w5SwiRjp/mhZU9R7bnRB7SflVV5bLabctN/wJW3Iqu | 12 KB | — | ✗ | 3rd |
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
DPage Weight InventoryAction62 resources · 1.5 MB · 305 KB savings availableFIX
~304.7 KiB of savings available
| # | Resource | Type | Size | Cache | Unused | 3rd party | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | ||||||
| 62 resources | 1.5 MiB | ||||||
FHTTP CachingActionNo cache headersFIX
No Cache-Control header
Adding a Cache-Control header can significantly improve repeat-visit performance.
BPage Weight Budget1.5 MB transferred, 62 requestsREVIEW
Large JavaScript bundles delay interactivity. Split code by route or defer non-critical scripts.
JavaScript bundle is large — code-split routes and lazy-load off-screen components to defer.
Source: web.dev
Subset fonts to include only used characters, or switch to system font stacks.
Font payload is large — subset to used glyphs only, or fall back to system fonts (zero load time).
Source: web.dev font loading
BJS Execution Cost562ms total JS executionREVIEW
Main Thread Breakdown
| Script | Total | Scripting | Parse/Compile | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.infoworld.com/ | 205ms | 27ms | 6ms | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NN43QC7W | 115ms | 95ms | 18ms | 3rd |
| https://cmpv2.infoworld.com/Notice.8f529.js | 88ms | 71ms | 9ms | 3rd |
| https://cmpv2.infoworld.com/unified/wrapperMessagingWithoutDetection.js | 80ms | 63ms | 4ms | 3rd |
| Unattributable | 73ms | 4ms | 0ms | 3rd |
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+Text CompressionAll text resources are compressedPASS
A+Image Optimization7 images, 0 KB saveablePASS
A+Font Loading5 fonts (403 KB)PASS
Web fonts
5
403 KB total
Render-blocking
0
of 5
Dominant font-display
swap
Most common across fonts
Font loading timeline
- Subset this font — over 100 KB suggests Latin Extended or full glyph coverage that most pages don't need
- Subset this font — over 100 KB suggests Latin Extended or full glyph coverage that most pages don't need
Optimization checklist
- Preload critical fonts (priority=high)
- Use woff2 format for all fonts
- Set font-display to swap, optional, or fallback
- Subset large fonts (≤100 KB each)
Fixing the unchecked items could save ~130 KB and ~260 ms
A+Resource CachingAll resources properly cachedPASS
A+Critical Rendering PathNo render-blocking resourcesPASS
A+Resource HintsNo optimization neededPASS
Network Waterfall62 requests over 1908msINFO
Third-Party Script CostPer-script blocking time, transfer cost, and cache headersINFO
| Script | Category | Execution | Transfer | Unused | Monthly Cost | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
www.infoworld.com www.infoworld.com | Other | 205ms | 62 KB | — | $4/mo | Costly |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 115ms | 209 KB | 28% | $2/mo | Optional |
cmpv2.infoworld.com cmpv2.infoworld.com | Other | 88ms | 91 KB | 67% | $2/mo | Optional |
cmpv2.infoworld.com cmpv2.infoworld.com | Other | 80ms | 42 KB | — | $1/mo | Optional |
Unattributable Unattributable | Other | 73ms | 0 KB | — | $1/mo | Optional |
These scripts may cost more than they're worth
- www.infoworld.com adds 205ms and costs ~$4/month
100% of JavaScript execution time is spent on third-party scripts. Consider auditing which scripts are essential.
When third-party JS execution time exceeds your own, performance gains from frontend work are capped by code you don't own.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Every millisecond of third-party JS competes with your own for main-thread time. If their share is bigger than yours, optimization on your code base barely moves the needle. Audit, defer, or remove third-parties before further frontend optimization. Use Lighthouse's third-party audit to identify the worst offenders.
Source: web.dev
www.infoworld.com takes 205ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
67% of cmpv2.infoworld.com's code is unused. The script may be loading features you don't use.
Bundle has high unused-code ratio — tree-shaking and route-splitting recover the wasted bytes.
Source: web.dev