Skip to content
https://latinaebusiness.it Export & share
IT · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €55/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-08-30 10:47 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.6m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 281ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (130ms), slowest from Singapore (543ms). No CDN detected. 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
159ms
DNS 32ms · TLS 44ms
United Stated - New York
201ms
DNS 150ms · TLS 15ms
United States - Santa Clara
171ms
DNS 67ms · TLS 34ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
130ms
DNS 63ms · TLS 24ms
Singapore - Singapore
543ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 181ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
481ms
DNS 111ms · TLS 123ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 281ms · Cache: no-cache

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

latinaebusiness.it fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 14.0 MB (4.7 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 5

180 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 16.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 16.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€578 investment → €2,614/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€578
10.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€2.614
€31.371/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+5332% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€3580.1 mo payback · +8675% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€28 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~24%.

Barriers
5
2 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+24pp
added vs baseline
Score
71
B
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
1
  • Page takes 16.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 14.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.1s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€578 10.5 developer hours at €55/hr
Quick wins
€28 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€2.614 / month at risk ~€31.371 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 2 image(s) with generic alt text
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€2.613 /mo

+24.3pp bounce · ~2,433 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 1.07

Bandwidth Waste

€1,09 /mo

14701.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page load
    Saves €1,09/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

33
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.25 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

16.69 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.15 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.32 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

19.59 s

Desktop

65
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

977 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.71 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

225 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.005

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.39 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

11.21 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Wix eCommerce · 13 peers
You 80
·
Avg 78
At average
0 50 100
Better than 38% of Wix eCommerce sites See full Wix eCommerce benchmark →
WebsiteBuilder · 13 peers
You 80
·
Avg 78
At average
0 50 100
Better than 38% of WebsiteBuilder sites See full WebsiteBuilder benchmark →

Technology stack

WebsiteBuilder

16 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Facebook Pixel Google Tag Manager Microsoft Clarity Pinterest Conversion Tag
Ecommerce
Wix eCommerce
CMS
WebsiteBuilder Wix
Framework
GSAP HSTS Open Graph Priority Hints RSS React 18.3.1 Sentry Sirvoy Underscore.js 4.17.23

All Detected Technologies (16)

WebsiteBuilder is a page-builder for creating web pages without knowledge of programming languages.

Categories Page builders Website https://www.websitebuilder.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Wix provides cloud-based web development services, allowing users to create HTML5 websites and mobile sites.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://www.wix.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://static.parastorage.com/unpkg/core-js-bundle@3.2.1/minified.js
Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wix.com/freesitebuilder/tae-store Detected by BeaverCheck

GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://greensock.com/gsap Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://static.parastorage.com/unpkg/react@18.3.1/umd/react.production.min.js, Script URL: https://static.parastorage.com/unpkg/react-dom@18.3.1/umd/react-dom.production.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Sirvoy is a cloud-based hotel management software that streamlines various hotel operations, including reservation management, channel management, online booking, and property management.

Categories Appointment scheduling Website https://sirvoy.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://underscorejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.

Categories Analytics Website https://facebook.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck

Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.

Categories Analytics Website https://clarity.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Pinterest Conversion Tag allows you to track actions people take on your website after viewing your Promoted Pin.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.pinterest.com.au/business/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (GSAP) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flatinaebusiness.it)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/latinaebusiness.it)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/latinaebusiness.it"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flatinaebusiness.it" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flatinaebusiness.it

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 10h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (84)
  • · Page weighs 14.0 MB (4.7 MB transferred)
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 10h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 180 inline style attribute(s) detected

Send Feedback