Skip to content
https://latinaebusiness.it

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
73
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.32g CO2 per view
FIX
1.32g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.32g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.7 MB, producing an estimated 1.32g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.25g, network 0.23g, end-user device 0.85g.
Got: 1.32g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 158.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 158.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 19852 smartphones.

1.32g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 30% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.7 MB

Your site
1.32g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.25g
Network
0.23g
End-user device
0.85g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 13.2 kg · Annual: 158.8 kg · ≈ 19852 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
70th percentile
FIX
70th percentile
Warning::
1.32g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 30% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 70th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.32g

70th percentile

Cleaner than 30% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 121% more
vs Target 165% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
93% cached
PASS
93% cached
Info::
93% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 342 KB (vs 4785 KB first visit). 608 of 609 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.23g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.09g CO2 (first visit: 1.32g)
First visit
4785 KB
Repeat visit
342 KB

93% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.23g CO2 per returning visitor

608 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
PASS
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 300 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
94% efficient

Total waste: 300 KB (6% of page weight)

Unused JS 300 KB

0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4785 KB
Theoretical minimum 4484 KB
Potential savings 300 KB (0.08g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
200 images, 162 KB total, 39 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

200

Total Size

162 KB

Oversized

27

Wasted

39 KB

200 missing dimensions
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback