Skip to content
https://latinaebusiness.it

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
73
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.41g CO2 per view
FIX
1.41g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.41g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 5.0 MB, producing an estimated 1.41g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.26g, network 0.24g, end-user device 0.91g.
Got: 1.41g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 169.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 169.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 21172 smartphones.

1.41g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 27% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 5.0 MB

Your site
1.41g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.26g
Network
0.24g
End-user device
0.91g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 14.1 kg · Annual: 169.4 kg · ≈ 21172 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
73th percentile
FIX
73th percentile
Warning::
1.41g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 27% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 73th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.41g

73rd percentile

Cleaner than 27% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 135% more
vs Target 182% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
93% cached
PASS
93% cached
Info::
93% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 342 KB (vs 5103 KB first visit). 639 of 640 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.32g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.09g CO2 (first visit: 1.41g)
First visit
5103 KB
Repeat visit
342 KB

93% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.32g CO2 per returning visitor

639 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
PASS
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 300 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
94% efficient

Total waste: 300 KB (6% of page weight)

Unused JS 300 KB

0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 5103 KB
Theoretical minimum 4803 KB
Potential savings 300 KB (0.08g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
200 images, 162 KB total, 39 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

200

Total Size

162 KB

Oversized

27

Wasted

39 KB

200 missing dimensions
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback