Skip to content
https://eltiempo.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
55
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
3.17g CO2 per view
FIX
3.17g CO2 per view
Critical::
3.17g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 11.2 MB, producing an estimated 3.17g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.59g, network 0.55g, end-user device 2.04g.
Got: 3.17g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 380.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 380.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 47612 smartphones.

3.17g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 11.2 MB

Your site
3.17g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.59g
Network
0.55g
End-user device
2.04g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 31.7 kg · Annual: 380.9 kg · ≈ 47612 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
3.17g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

3.17g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 429% more
vs Target 535% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
88% efficient
REVIEW
88% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 88%
An estimated 1398 KB (12%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1398 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.39g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
88% efficient

Total waste: 1398 KB (12% of page weight)

Unused JS 1398 KB

0.39g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 11477 KB
Theoretical minimum 10078 KB
Potential savings 1398 KB (0.39g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
95% cached
PASS
95% cached
Info::
95% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 538 KB (vs 11477 KB first visit). 389 of 402 resources are served from browser cache, saving 3.03g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.15g CO2 (first visit: 3.17g)
First visit
11477 KB
Repeat visit
538 KB

95% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 3.03g CO2 per returning visitor

389 resources served from cache · 13 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback